Express & Star

Wrongly convicted man ‘anxious about losing home’ for receiving compensation

Andrew Malkinson has been awarded compensation for the miscarriage of justice he suffered – but may have to leave his home as a result.

By contributor Mathilde Grandjean, PA
Published
Last updated
Andrew Malkinson
Andrew Malkinson, 59, spent 17 years in prison after he was wrongly convicted of rape in 2004 (Appeal/PA)

A man who served 17 years in prison for a crime he did not commit has said he is “really anxious” about losing his home as a result of receiving compensation.

Andrew Malkinson, 59, was wrongly convicted of rape in 2004 and chances to free him were repeatedly missed, leading to one of the worst miscarriages of justice in UK legal history.

He received the first payment of compensation a year and a half after the Court of Appeal quashed his conviction, but he may now lose access to social housing because the payments are not exempt from the assessment for state support.

Mr Malkinson told the PA news agency on Thursday he fears being forced to leave his home as a result.

Criminal Cases Review Commission
Andrew Malkinson, who served 17 years in prison for a rape he did not commit, reads a statement outside the Royal Courts of Justice in London, after being cleared by the Court of Appeal (Jordan Pettitt/PA)

“I am intensely relieved to finally be getting an interim payment. It still hasn’t really quite sunk in,” he said.

“It is good news and the implications seem endless, and many are good, but I am really anxious about losing my home.

“I got a social housing flat to live in that has been my refuge – you might think it is small but after a prison cell it feels massive.”

He added: “I understand that in other compensation schemes, payments like this are not counted when they are assessing you for benefits – why should the scheme for people like me who have been effectively kidnapped by the state be any different?

“The Government can fix this, and I hope they do so before I am forced to leave my home, which is just one more thing to worry about.”

Emily Bolton from the legal charity Appeal, which represented Mr Malkinson in challenging his wrongful conviction, said Mr Malkinson struggled to survive on benefits after he was freed from jail.

Ms Bolton added: “It is not just that he had to survive on benefits and handouts – many people face that struggle.

“It is that every interaction he has with the state reminds him of his wrongful conviction, even if it is just the DWP (Department for Work and Pensions) demanding he attend a meeting or send in a document.

“Andy will never trust the state again – and who can blame him?”

Lawyer Toby Wilton, who represented Mr Malkinson in his claims for compensation, told BBC Radio’s Today programme on Thursday: “There’s another, I think, symptom of successive governments not really having applied their minds to the statutory scheme for miscarriage of justice or as we’ve seen with the CCRC (Criminal Cases Review Commission), to miscarriages of justice.

“And that is that unlike other compensation payments, for example, payments made to victims of the Grenfell Tower fire, payments under the miscarriage justice scheme are not exempted when it comes to assessment for state support.

“Which means that just by virtue of having received this very happy news from me that he is has been awarded payments, Andy now faces prospects of losing the social housing that he waited a very long time to be given.”

Mr Wilton also criticised the £1 million cap on compensation payouts, which was set by the government in 2008.

He told BBC Radio’s Today programme: “In today’s money, it would be broadly twice that, two million.”

He further told the PA news agency: “It is good news that the Lord Chancellor has agreed Andy is eligible for compensation under the statutory compensation scheme.

“However, unfairness is built into the current scheme, even on top of the arbitrary £1m cap on compensation.”

Two of Mr Malkinson’s applications to have his case reviewed by the Criminal Cases Review Commission in 2009 and 2020 were rejected, until the Appeal charity commissioned fresh DNA tests that eventually led to his release.

It later emerged that he could have been freed a decade earlier if the similarities between his case and another wrongful conviction, that of a man called Victor Nealon, had been spotted and acted upon.

Mr Malkinson said: “It’s been a battle getting this far, and I would not have lasted a month without the support of Appeal and of members of the public who helped me out since that day in 2023 at the Court when my conviction was overturned.”

The Ministry of Justice and Department for Work and Pensions have been approached for comment.

Sorry, we are not accepting comments on this article.