Plans to convert bungalow 'of poor design' into modern family home turned down
A bid to turn a 1960s bungalow “of poor design” into a modern family home has been turned down by Stafford Borough Council because the extensions were considered “excessive”.
The proposals, which would have converted a former farmworkers’ single story home in Gayton into a two storey property, were recommended for refusal by the borough council’s planning officers.
They said: “The proposal by reason of its excessive scale, form, massing, composition and design would not comparable or proportionate to the existing dwelling and the character and appearance of the area.”
But ward councillor Frances Beatty called in the application for consideration by the planning committee.
There were no objections submitted to the borough council by residents – and Weston with Gayton Parish Council did not raise any concerns either.
Wednesday’s planning committee meeting, which was held remotely via video conference due to the current pandemic, was told the plans would make the existing property look more in keeping with other homes in the village.
A supporting statement from agent John Heath, which was read out by applicant Mark Stevens, said: “The garden extends to 2.2 acres. The property is set back from Church Lane and would not visually impact on amenity.
“The 1960s bungalow is of poor design and is totally out of place with the architectural style found in mid Staffordshire villages such as Gayton, which has a number of large detached buildings in their own gardens.
“This is not about a developer aiming to profit – it’s about the Stevens family wanting a house for their home.”
Councillor Beatty said: “Gayton is an historic village listed in the Domesday Book but it has suffered ongoing decline. It desperately needs young families and a mix of families to cement its future.
Conform
“This is one such family and the community has welcomed them with open arms. I understand everyone embraces their plans for this home for the 21st Century.”
The proposals divided opinion amongst committee members. Seven voted to refuse planning permission and four voted against the recommendation.
Councillor Andrew Harp said: “This is a vast improvement on what is there now. It isn’t going to interfere with anybody and it is accepted by the parish council. It is doing no harm – we should accept this.”
Councillor Anne Hobbs said: “It’s a fairly awful modern bungalow being turned into a more attractive house.”
Councillor Ann Edgeller said: “I think we have got to move with the times on this one. When you think that was built in the 1960s we have moved on a lot – now it is not fit for purpose.”
But other members said the plans put forward did not conform to the borough’s planning policies.
Councillor Tony Pearce said: “The wording states that (extensions) should be proportionate to the type and character of the existing development – this isn’t proportionate. Either we have planning rules or we don’t.”
Councillor Bryan Cross said: “I sympathise with Mr Stevens but this is a step too far in breaching rules and regulations we have to adhere to.”
Councillor Marnie Phillips said: “It’s far too large for the footprint that it sits on. The rules are here for a reason.”
